The line chart compares the consumption of fast food by australian teenagers by using three different types of food items over a period of 25 years.
It is clear that hamburgers were by far the most important means of consumption over the period shown,whereas the fish and chips declined over the period.
In 1975, fish and chips were the most important food that were being eaten 100 times a year. This was far higher than pizza and hamburgers, which were eaten well under 20 times a year. However, apart from brief rise from 1980 to 1985, the consumption of fish and chips were started to decline over the rest of the period to finish at just under 40.
Between 1975 to 2000, the consumption of pizza and hamburgers rose dramatically to a peak of 100 times a year, whereas the fish and chips were declining gradually to reach a figure of just under 40 times a year.
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount of fast food eaten by teenagers from Australia for 1975 to 2000. 73
- The graphs below show the numbers of male and female workers in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the republic of Freedonia.Write a report for a university teacher describing the information shown. 56
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount of fast food eaten by teenagers from Australia for 1975 to 2000. 73
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount of fast food eaten by teenagers from Australia for 1975 to 2000. 56
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount of fast food eaten by teenagers from Australia for 1975 to 2000. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 102, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , whereas
...ans of consumption over the period shown,whereas the fish and chips declined over the pe...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, well, whereas, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 716.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56050955414 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45887922891 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522292993631 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 204.3 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7828380505 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.333333333 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1666666667 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124308369437 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0712373707598 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056190414093 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0808446363339 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635804986872 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.