The line graph below shows the consumption of 4 different kinds of meat in a European country from 1979 to 2004.
The line graph illustrates, four several types of meat which is eaten weekly per person in a European country in 25 years between 1979 and 2004. Units are measured in grams.
Overall, it can be seen that the most popular consumption of meat among the European country is chicken whereas fish has experienced an opposite to the chicken. Ingestion of beef and lamb showed a decrease in the figure of eating throughout the entire period.
Beef was eaten almost 210 grams per person per week in 1979 though it showed some fluctuation but at the end of period 2004, it was steadily declined to 110 grams. Both chicken and lamb began with 150 grams where each person have showed an accelerated increase in the consumption of chicken per week so figure rise to the peak level which is approximately 280 grams but in 2004 it was slightly drooped to 250 grams while lamb dropped down dramatically to 60 grams in 2004.
Fish was the less eaten meat throughout the period which was 54 grams every week per person but after 1981 it falls down to 50 grams and it remained under 50 grams throughout the entire period.
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problem is to Increase the price of fuel 56
- The graph below show the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007 73
- The charts below shows the spending of school in UK from 1981 to 2001 73
- The graph below shows the population figures of different types of turtles in India between 1980 and 2012 78
- In some countries criminal trials are shown on television for the public Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 912.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62944162437 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41157891227 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543147208122 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.6684456011 43.030603864 185% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.285714286 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1428571429 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189306392974 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0955922802022 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0908405422699 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135156488531 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0882704086231 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.