The line graph compares three distinct countries in terms of the levels of household recycling during a 10-year period.
From an overall perspective, it is clear the recycling rates of each family based in the UK and Germany showed an upward trend, in contrast to that in France. Additionally, although the figure for France was initially the highest of all, it was lower than in the others at the end of the period.
In 2005, the French household recycling level stood at 50%, which was greater than that of the UK and Germany, at 35% and 20% respectively. In the following four years, the figure for France exhibited a considerable decline to about 40%. Meanwhile, the household recycling rates of the UK and Germany were observed with the same trend of going up at between 30% and 40% in 2009
In the last half of the period, both the figures for America and Germany witnessed a surge to about 60% in 2015. However, the data for France hit a record-low of 30%l 2013, before experiencing a slight recovery to 40% in the final year
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and ma
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts below show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and town B in 1960 2010 73
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oing up at between 30% and 40% in 2009 In the last half of the period, both the...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 860.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67391304348 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60250624444 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570652173913 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9515061158 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.857142857 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2857142857 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143149315643 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0653579107399 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692948738119 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0956646282559 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0696873549897 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.