The line graph below shows the number of cell phone subscribers in a particular city, by gender.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the demographic of men and women who subscribed to cell phone service in Marysville over a-20 year period starting from 1995.
In general, the initial impression from the chart is an upward trend was observed for both groups, despite fluctuations at varying degrees. Additionally, the number of female subscriptions was no longer higher than that in opposite counterparts from 2005 onwards.
As can be seen, all two genders participated in the cell phone sector at roughly similar levels in 1995, both at over 500 subscribers. The subsequent ten years saw the most significant increase for all women and men in terms of cell phone approval. Both female and male subscribers showed an overall increase of 2000, about fivefold its 1995 level, reaching at 2500 people.
It is notable that the figure witnessed a continuous rise in male subscribers to surge at the highest point at 2800 in 2015, despite also remaining unchanged during a period from 2005 to 2010. However, this was not the case for women's numbers. The number of women using cell phones fell by a further 200 to approximately 2300 prior to stabilizing until the end of the year 2015.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-10 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-10 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | view | |
| 2023-09-10 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | view | |
| 2023-09-10 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-10 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | view |
- The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000
- The line graph below gives information about the rates of unemployment between 1991 and 2005 in three different countries in Europe The table shows the percentage of men and women in the workforce in these three countries 73
- The line graph below shows the number of cell phone subscribers in a particular city by gender Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain 78
- The chart shows the unemployment situation in Australia in the year 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 981.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97969543147 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76789886733 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649746192893 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2861319942 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127839438532 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532291550961 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439885223823 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0822914115113 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461434474424 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.