The line graph below shows the number of single-family homes constructed in the United States by region over a period of six years.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting in the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The presented line graph depicts how many single-family houses were built in different areas of the United States in each of the years from 2006 to 2012.
Overall, the quantities of the new residential houses were built on a downtrend in all four areas from 2006 to 2010. Moreover, a significant spot was also found that the number of houses was invested to construct most in the South, while the construction of the Northeast was least.
On the one hand, we could perceive a considerable difference in the number of houses built in each region. In each of years shown on the graph, South always dominated the first place comparing to other areas with 900,000 houses were built in 2006, the year with the biggest construction. This number abruptly drop in 2008, and after two years, it reached the bottom with the lowest number - 300,000 houses. However, it was still the highest number of all the regions. In marked contrast, the lowest position belonged to Northeast with the most and least number which were under 200,000 in 2006 and approximately 50,000 in 2012.
On the other hand, 2006 was the year with the most construction in all the areas, and the quantities of all regions declined steadily until 2010, especially the sharpest and least slight fall which were in South and Northeast. However, three of the regions rose slightly again, except for the Northeast. In which, we could still see the continual decrease.
- The line graph below shows the number of single family homes constructed in the United States by region over a period of six years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting in the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The bar graph below shows the number of tourists visiting two different cities by season Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 93
- The bar graph below shows the number of tourists visiting two different cities by season Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1107.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71063829787 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43151929918 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463829787234 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9218369441 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.7 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0681669317283 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0334331286814 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0285474361763 0.0843802449381 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0526554151639 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295801744931 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.