The line bar provides information on the quantities of oil produced and consumed in China throughout a time-period of twenty-four years (from 1982 to 2006).
Overall, it becomes clear that there is an enormous discrepancy between the amounts of oil produced to the amounts consumed by the Chinese during the period mentioned above. More specifically, since 1992 an onwards significantly more oil is used by people in China compared to the ratio of oil produced.
In terms of oil consumption, the trajectory of the line fluctuated from time-period to time-period and retained an upward trend. In particular, from 1982 to 1990 oil consumption remained steady at two million oil barrels per day. After that, the trajectory from 1990 stared to rise constantly and peaked at nearly six and a half barrels per day by the end of 2006.
In contrast, the trajectory relating to oil production followed an entirely different trend. From 1982 to 1986 the line grew slightly from two million to three million barrels per day. However, from that point in time and until 2006 the trajectory remained relatively stable.
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in 4 countries in 1950 and 2003 and projections for 2050 73
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a salmon from egg to adult fish Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- the line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in china between 1982 and 2006 84
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people believe that visual images such as photos and videos provide enough evidence that a crime was committed Others think that they are not enough on their own and other evidence is needed Discuss both views and give your opinion 72
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, in contrast, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 930.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10989010989 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87624636304 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.3187326214 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.333333333 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24437924702 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103627058987 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560188865429 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15677997977 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369243455447 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.