The line bar provides information on the quantities of oil produced and consumed in China throughout a time-period of twenty-four years (from 1982 to 2006).
Overall, it becomes clear that there is an enormous discrepancy between the amounts of oil produced to the amounts consumed by the Chinese during the period mentioned above. More specifically, since 1992 an onwards significantly more oil is used by people in China compared to the ratio of oil produced.
In terms of oil consumption, the trajectory of the line fluctuated from time-period to time-period and retained an upward trend. In particular, from 1982 to 1990 oil consumption remained steady at two million oil barrels per day. After that, the trajectory from 1990 stared to rise constantly and peaked at nearly six and a half barrels per day by the end of 2006.
In contrast, the trajectory relating to oil production followed an entirely different trend. From 1982 to 1986 the line grew slightly from two million to three million barrels per day. However, from that point in time and until 2006 the trajectory remained relatively stable.
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 89
- In some countries people spend long hours at work Why does this happen Is it positive or negative development 78
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods 78
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people think that the best way to reduce crime is to give longer prison sentences Others however believe there are better alternative ways of reducing crime Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, in contrast, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 930.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10989010989 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87624636304 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.3187326214 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.333333333 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24437924702 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103627058987 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560188865429 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15677997977 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369243455447 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.