Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants. Why do you think people waste food? What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away?
In recent years, it is becoming common for individuals to purchase a high amount of food from shops and restaurants and put it in the garbage bin. The food waste is a major concern in Western countries, and there are many reasons for that explained below. By changing the people's belief on food waste and its effects, we could definitely eliminate the percentage of this behavior.
The two main factors of food loss throughout the consumption process are the lack of appropriate planning and the purchase of too much food. It is true that sometimes people buy food without any planning on when and how they will consume it. Coupled with the contemporary schedules of work and appointments, people, therefore, tend to change food preparation plans or fail to remember using it on time. Furthermore, in many cases, we order more food than we need. As a result, it is obvious that the excess food on the plate will go to waste.
Assuming that the phenomenon of food waste is the major source of the greenhouse gas methane, with tremendous effects on greenhouse effect, governments and companies should take radical measures to mitigate this phenomenon. Firstly, people's behavior can alter by concentrated media attention on the subject. For example, a British campaign called “Love Food, Hate Waste” has raised awareness about preventative measures to address food waste for consumers. Secondly, campaigns from advisory and environmental groups, whether with public donation or not, can inform people about the negative effects of food loss. They could also advise them about the most effective ways to plan more properly their food shopping.
In conclusion, the phenomenon of food waste has increased in recent times, mainly because of inappropriate food management when we buy or eat food. However, there are a lot of ways to get rid of it related to public's awareness on the issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-30 | Hoàng Ngọc Thảo My | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | nle.hngoc | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-04 | minhtuvn23 | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | phamminhtu | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | phamminhtu | 61 | view |
- The diagram shows how the glass is recycled
- It is not necessary for people to travel to other places to learn about the culture We can learn as much as from books films and the Internet To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Buying things on the Internet such as books air tickets and groceries is becoming more and more popular Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Some people believe that visual images such as photos and videos provide enough evidence that a crime was committed Others think that they are not enough on their own and other evidence is needed Discuss both views and give your opinion 72
- The bar chart below shows the number of houses built per year in two cities Derby and Nottingham Between 2000 and 2009 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 273, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...r that explained below. By changing the peoples belief on food waste and its effects, w...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, in many cases, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07371794872 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77500992115 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3581741686 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.533333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1333333333 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378076725552 0.244688304435 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129166526837 0.084324248473 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553588513136 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241474270828 0.151304729494 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314239830507 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.