Some People think that old buildings should be knocked down and give way to modern buildings To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Some People think that old buildings should be knocked down and give way to modern buildings. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Many people support the construction of new buildings of modern architecture, instead of the old-fashioned ones. I totally agree with this statement because modern buildings could be more environmentally friendly, and smart resource-savers as well.

Firstly, as long as cities, nowadays, are supposed to handle with environmental problems, the manufacture of establishments which can have a huge positive impact on the environment is really needed. Even though old buildings are designed in a very specific and remarkable way, delivering the special architectural aspect of each city, they are not capable of protecting the nature somehow. By contrast, recent architects and engineers are aware of the techniques to construct green buildings, which are designed and operate by eliminating the negative impacts on the environment. For example, sustainable buildings in the USA were constructed in order to use less water, energy or natural resources, resulting in reducing waste and pollution. This is a very important reason to support the construction of such modern buildings.

Secondly, modern buildings could be constructed smartly by using automated processes to automatically control the building’s operations. Operations including heating, ventilation, air conditioning, lighting, security and other systems are then regulated by the building its own. These infrastructures help owners, operators and facility managers improve asset reliability and performance, which reduces energy use, and optimizes how space is used. One example of energy efficiency is the use of optimal start/stop, which allows the building automation system to learn when it should bring the air conditioning system online for a particular zone in the building.

In conclusion, in my opinion the benefits of the construction of modern buildings outweigh the costs of destructing the old buildings, mainly because of their contribution to the environment and the absence of waste resources.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-10-25 minhquanvn 61 view
2021-02-01 idid382002 84 view
2021-01-31 idid382002 84 view
2020-11-30 Sprios_D 85 view
2020-02-22 xenocide 87 view
Essays by user Sprios_D :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 250, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dly, and smart resource-savers as well. Firstly, as long as cities, nowadays, ar...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 830, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... construction of such modern buildings. Secondly, modern buildings could be cons...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 664, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... for a particular zone in the building. In conclusion, in my opinion the benefit...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, really, second, secondly, so, then, well, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1691.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.81099656357 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33963693479 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628865979381 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.623952978 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.916666667 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215116329387 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825306981771 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682105180593 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14176765145 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588422067793 0.056905535591 103% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.85 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.