Some people think that old buildings should be knocked down and give way to modern buildings. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In current days, many out-of-dated architectures have to be destroyed and replaced by modern ones. Personally, I myself can just partly agree with the opinion because of following reasons.
On the one hand, it is true that many old architecture contain varied historical meanings, thus notwithstanding destroying those historical figures, people need to protect and reconstruct them to be well-known attractive destinations, hence local people can increase the number of income through tourism activities. Moreover, the government may improve facilities of old architecture, thus this is the best way to solve homeless problems. Generally speaking, many developed countries encounter directly unwanted situations which belong to the number of homeless dramatically increase on a daily basis, and this negative development can accidentally harm to the national economy. Hence, using old architecture is the best way to tackle the issue without spending too much money on less crucial activities.
On the other hand, if people do not accept reconstructing houses, it can be an accidentally dangerous factor for users. For example, because the facilities and details in houses are out of date, people can directly encounter some bad situations such as roofs being broken down, walls being eaten by woodworms. Mentally speaking, the development of each country is estimated by modern attractive amenities and facilities, thus this can attract foreign visitors from different countries who can benefit local people through using services.
In conclusion, I myself believe that reconstructing and reusing out of date architecture can bring many positive benefits as well as building new ones. Hence, I can just partly agree with the given opinions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-25 | minhquanvn | 61 | view |
| 2021-02-01 | idid382002 | 84 | view |
| 2021-01-31 | idid382002 | 84 | view |
| 2020-11-30 | Sprios_D | 85 | view |
| 2020-02-22 | xenocide | 87 | view |
- Some people think that people who destroy public property should be punished by community services instead of other punishments such as paying a fine and going to prison To what extent do you agree or disagree 74
- Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn about current events However others believe that they can learn news better through other media Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn about current events However others believe that they can learn news better through other media Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
- People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life What are these problems Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 34, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun architecture seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much old architecture', 'a good deal of old architecture'.
Suggestion: much old architecture; a good deal of old architecture
...ns. On the one hand, it is true that many old architecture contain varied historical meanings, thu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65151515152 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08209527672 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609848484848 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.7622941147 49.4020404114 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.636363636 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9090909091 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155633549751 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593473399477 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0306418895909 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0896579078297 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0236436164544 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.