The typical teaching situation of a teacher and students in the class will not exist by the year 2050. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people state that the traditional teaching system with instructors and pupils in a classroom will be disappeared in the next thirty years. I agree with this statement because of the advancements of technology and their implementation in academic circumstances.
Firstly, computers, and the consistent connection to the Internet, are becoming already predominant in a plethora of learning methods. Online learning is one of the latter, not often used in the past, but present in most of cases recently. This type of teaching has replaced the old-fashioned system of tutors and students, while both of them interact through desktops, laptops, tablets or even mobile phones, wherever they can find internet connection and a device with camera. To illustrate this, distance learning is already offered by the top world universities, like Stanford and Harvard, a case which shapes a different future for the next generations.
Secondly, technology developments in 2050 will lead to the input of artificial intelligence into the classrooms. More specifically, robots are likely to replace teachers and instructors of every scientific field, illustrating a radical change in traditional teaching systems. Artificial intelligence has already been embedded in our lives with smart cars, and household devices, making drivers' and peoples' lives easier. In this way, it will be added in schools and universities by either helping teachers or replacing them. However, according to a survey, the role of teachers cannot be replaced by robots because of the formers' contribution to shape students' behavior; an attitude which does not exist in intelligent machines.
In conclusion, traditional teaching and student life will alter in the near future, due to the technology, and especially the achievement of e-learning, and artificial intelligence in classes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-24 | Roy An | 11 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | viviannguyen | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-21 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-20 | moledro | 70 | view |
| 2020-11-24 | Sprios_D | 78 | view |
- The diagram shows how the glass is recycled
- Some cities create housing areas by providing taller buildings Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land What solution is better 84
- It is suggested that primary school children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do you think that the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 61
- Buying things on the Internet such as books air tickets and groceries is becoming more and more popular Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own kn 73
- More and more people are expected to be living in the urban centres in the future What problems can be caused Should government encourage people to settle outside the city 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 217, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the cases') or simply say ''most cases''.
Suggestion: most of the cases; most cases
... often used in the past, but present in most of cases recently. This type of teaching has rep...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 622, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'formers'' or 'former's'?
Suggestion: formers'; former's
...ot be replaced by robots because of the formers contribution to shape students behavior...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61209964413 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17289274771 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615658362989 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9976286577 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.416666667 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4166666667 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129621643396 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0457604964857 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377736063659 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0796759996172 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421935368603 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.