The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.
The line graph represents how many tourists visited four different attractions (art gallery, pavilion, pier and festival) in Brighton from 1980 to 2000. Units are measured in a percentage.
Overall, there were some changes with the tourists' preferences in visiting four different attractions over the projected periods. It is apparent that, pavilion had the most of visitors in most of years whereas the proportion of tourists visiting art gallery experienced a steady declining trend.
In terms of pavilion and festival, while pavilion increased in the percentage of tourists from 20% to 50% between 1980 and 1995, it decreased to record at 30% of tourists by 2010, festival remained almost unchanged with the proportion of tourists of about 25% during the same periods. After 1995, there was a slow fall in tourists' visiting rate for the pavilion and by 2010, it recorded of 30% tourists. Meanwhile, the festival had the same proportion of 25% tourists visiting rates.
In contrast, art gallery had experienced the most significant fluctuations over the periods. For the fist decade, the art gallery had a quick rise from 20% to 40% of tourists and then the proportion of tourists plummeted steadily until it reached at below 10% of tourists in 2010.
In opposite to tumbling preferences of tourists visited the art gallery, there was an increase in the percentage of tourists visited the pier. For the first decade, it also had a quick peak to 18% in 1985 just like the art gallery, but it rose constantly until it had over a quarter of tourists visited the pier by the end of the projected periods.
- The following chart illustarates the results of a British survy taken i 2005 related to housing preferences of UK people. 73
- Some people feel that certain workers like nurses, doctors and teachers are undervalued and should be paid more, especially when other people like film actors or company bosses are paid huge sums of money that are out of proportion to the importance of th 67
- Some countries are not popular with using a bicycle even though it is benificial for tham. why?What are the possible solutions to envourage people to use more of bicycle as the main transport? 84
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. 73
- paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it a valuable work experience, which is important for learning and taking responsibility. What is your opinion? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 168, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the visitors') or simply say ''most visitors''.
Suggestion: most of the visitors; most visitors
.... It is apparent that, pavilion had the most of visitors in most of years whereas the proportion...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 188, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the years') or simply say ''most years''.
Suggestion: most of the years; most years
...t, pavilion had the most of visitors in most of years whereas the proportion of tourists visi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'so', 'then', 'whereas', 'while', 'in contrast']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.273026315789 0.268076937826 102% => OK
Verbs: 0.121710526316 0.116061578633 105% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0592105263158 0.0759168565197 78% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0296052631579 0.0366838410393 81% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0230263157895 0.0131127313244 176% => OK
Prepositions: 0.177631578947 0.155750635184 114% => OK
Participles: 0.0361842105263 0.0379272487307 95% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.7525758001 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0197368421053 0.0210936926555 94% => OK
Particles: 0.00328947368421 0.00175180941692 188% => OK
Determiners: 0.105263157895 0.0948980150116 111% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00328947368421 0.00967000014798 34% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1601.0 1161.00487805 138% => OK
No of words: 268.0 196.9 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.97388059701 5.90752243213 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.73763899035 108% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.350746268657 0.337110787985 104% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.328358208955 0.247514529752 133% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.276119402985 0.171178102325 161% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.115671641791 0.112407865282 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7525758001 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.451492537313 0.546246751206 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 42.0435080066 49.3433353143 85% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 8.93414634146 123% => OK
Sentence length: 24.3636363636 23.0094962315 106% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.3033873123 42.9750493124 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.545454545 135.714022679 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3636363636 23.0094962315 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.818181818182 0.689975730869 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.84146341463 130% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.48048780488 135% => OK
Readability: 57.1994572592 47.7609492067 120% => OK
Elegance: 2.79245283019 2.94281807926 95% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.507760513442 0.418131533498 121% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.185024591382 0.181151798455 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.115891761045 0.0850326197045 136% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.723581260016 0.706616315825 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.162823172077 0.157042692854 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.264707128959 0.228904883108 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0933180230831 0.108899403657 86% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.454765800764 0.367819155151 124% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.145611828439 0.0812612215331 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.356713515077 0.316326947829 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443249106045 0.0921553760075 48% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70731707317 216% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.08536585366 73% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 3.16585365854 221% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.02926829268 66% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 7.1512195122 126% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.