The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
<p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 14.5pt; font-family: Verdana; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; vertical-align: baseline;">The given line graph provides information from the research into the popular of tourist attractions in Brighton town over a 30-year period between 1980 and 2010. </span></p><br><br><br><br><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 14.5pt; font-family: Verdana; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; vertical-align: baseline;">Overall, according to the data, number of visitors to the pier and the pavilion followed upward trend. In contrast, remaining counterparts witnessed decreased over the period.</span></p><br><br><br><br><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 14.5pt; font-family: Verdana; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; vertical-align: baseline;">To be specific, there was nearly a quarter of travelers decided being to Brighton’s pavilion in 1980. The proportion then climbed steadily to approximate 48% in 1995. However, this statistic rapidly fall from its peak to just above 30% 15 years later. Despite witnessing a fluctuation around 10% during the terms 1980-2000, the percentage of foreigners selected Brighton pier as their destinations was sharply raised to double in the end of the period.</span></p><br><br><br><br><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 14.5pt; font-family: Verdana; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; vertical-align: baseline;">Turning to the downward trending counterparts, after experiencing a significant rise in the number of visitors, Brighton art gallery dramatically lost their popularity over time, from the peak of just under 40% of foreign tourists to less than one tenth in 2010. Proportion for Festival’s visitors declined over the period as well. However, the percentage remained stable around about 28%.</span></p><div><span style="font-size: 14.5pt; font-family: Verdana; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; vertical-align: baseline;"><br></span></div>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | Kien Vu | 11 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Kien Vu | 11 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Kien Vu | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Sagar Gurung | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-02 | Trần Thị Như Quỳnh | 84 | view |
- The chart shows the number of students in the UK universities who completed (on time or late) failed to write and rewrote their dissertation in 1990, 2000, 2010. 11
- The charts show world pineapple exports by the top three pineapple producing countries in 2009 and 2019 and a breakdown of the cost to the consumer of each pineapple in 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make c 78
- Today many countries import food from different parts of the world Is this a positive or negative development 84
- Consumers are faced with increasing numbers of advertisements from competing companies To what extent do you think consumers are influenced by advertisements What measures can be taken to protect them 11
- The chart below gives information about the most common sports played in New Zealand in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, well, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2209.0 965.302439024 229% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 260.0 196.424390244 132% => OK
Chars per words: 8.49615384615 4.92477711251 173% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 6.9229102544 2.65546596893 261% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542307692308 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 283.868780488 194% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.1 1.45097560976 145% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 22.4926829268 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 293.876900509 43.030603864 683% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 315.571428571 112.824112599 280% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 37.1428571429 22.9334400587 162% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0303475602012 0.215688989381 14% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0141358208794 0.103423049105 14% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0161464654821 0.0843802449381 19% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0303475602012 0.15604864568 19% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 37.2 13.2329268293 281% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -8.38 61.2550243902 -14% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 18.2 6.51609756098 279% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 23.6 10.3012195122 229% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 32.61 11.4140731707 286% => Coleman_liau_index is high.
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 40.7170731707 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 39.5 11.4329268293 345% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.9970731707 153% => OK
text_standard: 24.0 11.0658536585 217% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.