The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton
The line graph compares the proportion of tourists Who visited four different types of Brighton attractions in England over a period of 30 years from 1980 to 2010.
It is clear that the percentage of visitors to the Pavilion and the Pier both increased, while there were noticeable decreases in the figures for the Art Gallery and the Festival over the period shown.
In 1980, the proportion of tourists to the Festival was highest, at around 30%, whereas the figure for the Pier was remarkably lower, at only 10%. Meanwhile, about 24% of visitors to England who went to the Pavilion compared to roughly 22% to the Pier. In 1985, the percentage of visitors to the Art Gallery grew dramatically to a peak of approximately 38%. Likewise, the figures for the Pavilion and the Pier were slight increases, at 28% and 15% respectively. By contrast, the proportion of tourists who visited the Festival slightly went down.
Between 1985 and 1995, the percentage of visitors to the Pavilion experienced a significant rise to approximately 50% and became the highest figure in the line graph. Although this figure decreased to about 30% in 2010, it was above the starting figure of the period. The proportion of tourists to the Art Gallery declined considerably to below 10% in 2010. At the same time, the Pier's figure saw a small rise to just over 20%. Tourists who visited the Festival slightly fell to roughly 28% in 2000 and remained at this level for the rest of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-31 | maiphuonganh | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | maiphuonganh | 11 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | maiphuonganh | 11 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 61
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005 67
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton 78
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the seaside resort of Templeton between 1990 and 2005. 78
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1219.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 254.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79921259843 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71348967679 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46062992126 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 365.4 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8992634053 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.583333333 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246969432929 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0965478517601 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121095353568 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18781267486 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.161946424259 0.0819641961636 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.