The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.
The line graph compares the proportion of tourists to England Who visited four differents types of Brighton attractions over a 21 years period from 1980 to 2010.
It is clear from the line graph that the percentage of visitors to the Pavillion and Pier rose, there were sharp decreases in the figures for the Art Gallery and Festival during the research period.
In 1980, the percentage visiting the Festival was highest, at about 30%, while the figure for Pier was significantly decrease of 10%. Meanwhile, approximately 21% of tourist to England Who visited the Pavillion compared to only less than 21% of the Art Gallery. In 1985, the rate of visitors to the Art Gallery increased slightly to roughly 39%, whereas the percentage visiting Pavillion and Pier were slowly rise of 28% and 15%, respectively. Particularly after 1990, the percentage of Pavillion dramatically went up to approximately 50% in 1995.
After 1995, although the proportion of tourists to the Pavillion decreased to about 30% in 2010, it was above the starting figure of the period and became the highest figure compared to other attractions. Meanwhile, the percentage visiting the Pier was steadily increase to above 20%, whereas the figure for the Art Gallery dramatically declined to below 10%. At the same time, the proportion of visitors to the Festival remained steady, at 29%.
- The chart below shows the number of travelers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000. 84
- The charts below show the results of a survey about what people of different age groups say makes them most happy 91
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket. 61
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton 67
- the chart shows the division of household tasks by gender in Great Britain. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'decreased'.
Suggestion: decreased
...e the figure for Pier was significantly decrease of 10%. Meanwhile, approximately 21% of...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 409, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'risen'.
Suggestion: risen
...visiting Pavillion and Pier were slowly rise of 28% and 15%, respectively. Particula...
^^^^
Line 4, column 263, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'increased'.
Suggestion: increased
...rcentage visiting the Pier was steadily increase to above 20%, whereas the figure for th...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1140.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11210762332 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83768998761 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488789237668 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 343.8 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8275707058 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.666666667 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7777777778 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270566773152 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115663961293 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129275760344 0.0843802449381 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199449145448 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.152701859423 0.0819641961636 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.