Line graph : Clothing Export in 1999 - 2003 in Japan, Colombia and Myanmar.
The figure elucidates the number of clothing exports in three different nations from 1999 to 2003. At first glance, it is evident that over the entire period, the most noticeable alteration occurred in the number of export of clothing in Myanmar.
In accordance with Japan and Colombia which faced a fluctuation, 1999 to 2001 witnessed a palpitation in the amount of Japan clothing export in which it achieved at 600 millions in 2001, and erratically, it plunged significantly to finish at just below 500 millions. Furthermore, following the same pattern as Japan, the total of clothing export in Colombia, initially, increased tremendously between 1999, which was at well beyond 400 millions, and 2002, which made up at 700 millions, suddenly, it dropped considerably in the following years to end at just over 600 millions.
In regard to Myanmar, there was an enormous rise in the amount of clothing export in Myanmar in which it upright positioned at well under 100 millions in 1999 and rose highly in the next 2 years to achieve at well less than 1000 millions, nevertheless, it faced an oscillation over the following 2 years and finished at just across 400 millions.
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 78
- Space exploration requires vast sums of money. Is the amount of money spent on space research justifiable? Could the money be better spent?What is your viewpoint on this issue? Give reasons for your answer. 61
- Topic: technology is becoming increasingly prevalent in the world today. In the not too distant future, technology will completely replace the teacher in the classroom. Do you agree with this statement? 67
- The maps : the plans below show the layout of a university’s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment. 67
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, nevertheless, well, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 983.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01530612245 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88280656987 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540816326531 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 22.4926829268 173% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 95.0608226348 43.030603864 221% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 196.6 112.824112599 174% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.2 22.9334400587 171% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2 5.23603664747 214% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270569028425 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174687223977 0.103423049105 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476924228034 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197968104731 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575176153312 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.8 13.2329268293 165% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.1 10.3012195122 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.43 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.9970731707 160% => OK
text_standard: 22.0 11.0658536585 199% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.