Given is the line graph depicting the proportion of total spending for 5 distinct sectors in a certain European country during a 40 years period, initiating from 1960.
It is perceptible that the percentage of expenses for transport leaped within 40 years, meanwhile, the opposite was true for other categories.
Of all items to be paid, fuel and energy cost people in this country the least when it stood at 6% in the first year, the percentage of fuel/energy expenditure slumped to approximately 3% in the 2000s. With the proportion of clothing spending, it startied at a higher level compared to fuel and energy with 10% in 1960 and then plunged to 5% after 40 years. In terms of the proportion of leisure spending, this kind of activity accounted for 19% in the first year before plummeting to 11% 40 years later.
Likewise, the percentage of money for food ranked first at approximately 33% in the first year; however, it was surpassed by transport expenditure in the year 2000 because of a period of a diminution to 14% in the 2000s. Conversely, comprising only 9% of the aggregate spending in 1996, transport recorded an exponential surge to 15% in the last year shown.
- The table below shows information and predictions regarding the change in percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries 10
- Task Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world Do you agree or disagree 80
- The government should control the amount of violence in films and televisions in order to decrease violent crimes in society To what extent do you agree or disagree 76
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Panama City from 2010 to 2019
- The map below shows the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...40 years period, initiating from 1960. It is perceptible that the percentage of...
^^^
Line 2, column 146, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...opposite was true for other categories. Of all items to be paid, fuel and en...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, however, likewise, then, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 981.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83251231527 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87546359868 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576354679803 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 29.6055703529 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.142857143 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174652594938 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824026735888 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114789658817 0.0843802449381 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121322896171 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138951319779 0.0819641961636 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.33 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.