Task2: A university plans to develop a new research center in your country. Some people want a center for business research. Other people want a center for research in agriculture (farming). Which of these two kinds of research centers do you recommend for your country? Use specific reasons in your recommendation.
University, in my impression, is similar to a mini version of the real world since school founders want to create a place which neatly simulates society so that their students can experience what the world is like. A university in my country, with the same purpose, wants to ameliorate a new research center. However, people are considering whether the school should make it a business research or an agriculture one. As for me, building an agriculture research center is a good idea due to some rational reasons.
First of all, the agriculture research center aids in restricting the adverse impact of cultivation on the environment. Woefully, cultivation cannot avoid cutting down trees which increases soil infertility and leads to land erosion. Furthermore, using pesticides and herbicides is likely to contaminate the soil. Therefore, if the university decides to develop an agriculture center, it might be able to come up with proper solutions to prevent the hazardous influences of cultivation on residents’ lives. For example, there is an agricultural technique for growing crops without disturbing the soil called “no-till farming”. This advanced method helps decrease the amount of soil erosion and sandy soil phenomenon.
Second, it is essential for an overpopulated agricultural country to construct an agriculture center. Vietnam has been widely known as the world’s second-largest rice exporter; also, exporting rice is the major field of Vietnam to increase GDP. Thereby, peasants are needed to be given enough land by the government to execute their work. Besides the fact that rice export is Vietnam’s main facet, expansion of cultivated land also supports citizens’ need for food as the population keeps growing. There is a concern among policymakers about how to meet the demand of population growth when natural resources are being shrunk. Hence, enlargement of the agriculture area is one of the most appropriate measures which lives up to this problem.
Finally, one of the biggest benefits that agriculture center construction exerts is creating a variety of jobs. Compared to the business center establishment, farmers who do not have academic knowledge about business definitely are not capable of earning money. On the contrary, constructing agricultural zones will exert more appropriate jobs for those peasants as well as help to upgrade their lives.
In conclusion, I strongly suggest the university create an agriculture research center and make an attempt at inventing new modern techniques to save the planet as well as advocate an agricultural country to cope with overpopulation.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to work in a larger company than a small one 88
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of a house or a building they are living in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 84
- The charts below show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and town B in 1960 2010 78
- When you face a difficult problem in life what do you feel is the best way to solve it asking someone with more experience for advice about the problem finding information about the problem using the Internet taking a long time to think about the problem 80
- The maps below show a bookstore in 2000 and now 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 403, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as well as help to upgrade their lives. In conclusion, I strongly suggest the un...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, well, as for, for example, in conclusion, as well as, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 43.0788530466 37% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2222.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 408.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44607843137 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10510100466 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600490196078 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 707.4 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.286680661 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.1 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.45110844103 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333036631549 0.236089414692 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0972718664508 0.076458572812 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0919494730587 0.0737576698707 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184773130169 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0794825710811 0.0645574589148 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 86.8835125448 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.