The line chart compares the number of people who went to 3 museums in London from June to September 2013.
Overall, the most noticeable change was that the British Museum was the most viewed destination throughout the period. In addition, the number of viewers of British and Science museums increased over the period, whereas the interest in Natural History museum dropped from June to September.
British museum stood at 600000 in the beginning, the highest of all, and saw a steady rise to around 700000in July. However, July to August witnessed a rapid drop of visitors to 500000. After that, there was a gradual rise in the number of visitors to approximately 650000 in September. In terms of Science museum, 400000 people, the lowest of all, visited the place in June, after which the number declined steadily to 300000 in August; however, there was a rapid rise in visitors to around 450000 at the end of the graph period.
In contrast, the Natural History museum started the period at about 550000 and dropped the number to around 375000. Nevertheless, the number of visitors rose slightly to about 450000 in September, which was approximately similar to the Science Museum.
- Some people think that environmental problems are too big for individuals to solve Others believe individuals can also do some things to solve these problems Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- The graph shows the spending on education medical care and pension in a particular country from 2001 to 2051 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Unemployment is one of the biggest problems of contemporary society What do you think are the main causes of unemployment What solutions can you suggest 11
- The line chart details the proportion of residents living in Australia in millions from different regions between 1976 and 2011 78
- The maps show the village park 10 years ago and the village park now 39
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, nevertheless, whereas, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 994.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0202020202 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54819877727 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494949494949 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5101028892 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.444444444 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146771295526 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711992844687 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522520433392 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101601107577 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496704565871 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.