The line graph shows the customers in four restaurants between 1990 and 2015
The given chart depicts information about how many people went to four eateries from 1990 to 2015.
Overall, the emerging fact from the chart is that there were dramatically difference in the popularity of restaurants. While the two top ones in 1990, pizza hut and chick spot experienced a decline in customers over the period, burger bar and donut bro saw a significant rise.
Looking at more details, in 1990, 8000 persons who ate at pizza hut, which was almost 2000 more than the figure for a chicken spot. On the other hand, the donut bro only had 2500 consumer that year and burger bar had even fewer, with just over 100. However, these lower-performing restaurants saw a change over the next five years, before a significant rise from 1995 to 2005, when they had 6000 and 3000 buyers respectively. Likewise, the growth continued by till 2015, donut bro increased to 8000 and burger bar value under just 4000.
In contrast, from 1990 onward, pizza hut saw a steady decline in customers. Although there was a slight increment in 2010, in 2015 only 5000 individual visited, the value fallen by 3000. Meanwhile, despite inclined from 6000 to 7000 in the years 1990 to 2000, chicken spot also experienced a considerable declined in consumer numbers.
- The first graph shows the weight in tonnes of fruit produced by the farm each month in 2013 and also almost in tonnes of fertilizer used The second graph shows the volume of rainfall in each month 84
- Rich countries should allow jobs for skilled and knowledgeable employees who are from poor countries Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 73
- In the future no body will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything online without paying To what extend do you agree or disagree to this opinion 78
- The table and notes below give information about student enrolment at Brighton co ed secondary school in 1990 2000 and 2010 73
- The chart shows the consumption of sales of coffee in five different cities 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent to four eateries from 1990 to 2015. Overall, the emerging fact from the char...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, likewise, look, so, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1040.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85981308411 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62264039496 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630841121495 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.1772958248 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127574562197 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0500345305611 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421988046137 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0895309174379 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398112030152 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.