The chart below shows the household spending pattern in two countries between 1980 and 2008
The charts compare five categories of household expenditure in the uk and new zealand in the year 1980 and 2008.
Overall, it is clear from the illustration that the percentage of expenditure on food and drinks declined significantly in both countries over the period, whereas expenses on utility bills surged.
In 1980, 29% of new zealand household budget went on food and drinks, while the equivalent figure for the uk was 23%. By contrast, both countries experienced a slight increase in expenses on utility bills for the average home, from 27% to 30% in new zealand and from 26% to 28% in England. With regards to in both years, the money on leisure remained higher in the uk as against new zealand.
Marching forward, a similar amount of money spend on other categories in both years for the uk and new zealand which was 11% and 9% respectively. In terms of transport, there was a negligible decrease in the percentile of transport for both countries from 15% to 14% and 17% to 16% in new zealand.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-23 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | minhhh123 | view | |
| 2023-08-03 | brew | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | quan12341234 | 11 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | quan12341234 | 11 | view |
- Although some countries with long working hours are economically successful this often had some negative consequences To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Youths are often called up for working for the development of communities Some people say that they should work voluntarily whereas others say that they should get paid Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- In the future no body will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything online without paying To what extend do you agree or disagree to this opinion 78
- The graph shows internet usage in three countries between 1999 and 2009
- Rich countries should allow jobs for skilled and knowledgeable employees who are from poor countries Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 830.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71590909091 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74708711243 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539772727273 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7419441813 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.571428571 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.57142857143 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111795401909 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626193383658 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652548476996 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0890686827108 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.071974596929 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.