The line graph shows the income of four cafes in New York over last year.
The line graph illustrates how much money was earned by four cafes in New York over the last year.
Overall, while an upward trend was experienced by three cafes namely Internet Express, Wi-fi Cafe and Cafe Cool, the opposite was true for The Tea Room.
Standing at $160000, the figure for The Tea Room’s income in January was the highest in comparison with the other three cafes. During the next nine months, the earnings for this cafe fluctuated wildly, and the trend was downward, which was followed by a dramatic decrease from $140000 to $50000 in the last three months. In contrast, the income for Cafe Cool, which was $30000, was only one fifth of the income for The Tea Room in January, but later this figure witnessed an upward trend from February to November before rocketing to reach its peak at $120000 at the end of the year.
As regards Internet Express, while the earnings for this cafe,which was $100000 , was twice as much as that of Wi-fi Cafe in January, Internet Express had almost the same income as Wi-fi Cafe in May. For the last seven months, the income for Internet Express increased steadily before ending the year at $120000. On the other hand, from July to September the earnings for Wi-fi Cafe declined about $40000, but later the figure for its income rose dramatically and hit the highest point of $190000 in December.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 62, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , which
...xpress, while the earnings for this cafe,which was 00000 , was twice as much as that o...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e earnings for this cafe,which was 00000 , was twice as much as that of Wi-fi Cafe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, while, as regards, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1101.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66525423729 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.17996914761 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.2263625997 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.625 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239874068183 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141393102989 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155693754489 0.0843802449381 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219490944305 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.190284860149 0.0819641961636 232% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.4 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.