The line graph shows visits to and from the UK from 1979 to 1999, and the bar graph shows the most popular countries visited by UK residents in 1999.
The line graph depicts the number of visitors, who visited UK and from UK in million from 1979 to 1999, while the bar chart illustrates the most popular and least popular country among UK resident in 1999.
Overall, as shown in bar chart tourist who visit abroad from UK are higher than who visit to UK, whereas France was the most demanded touristic destination for UK resident.
To begin with, the both graph line visit to UK and from UK follow the increasing trend throughout the year, while visit abroad by UK citizens exceeds the graph. Both graphs start with almost similar ratio with around 10 million in 1979 and follow the same trend, but visitors who visit abroad from UK rose significantly and end with over 50 million. However, people who visit UK rose gradually and finished with just under 30 million.
Turning to bar chart, in 1999 the most famous touristic place for UK citizen was France, where over 10 million UK visitors reached there and this was followed by Spain with approximately 10 million. Moreover, USA, Greek and Turkey was far less and accounted under 5 million. However, the Turkey was depicts as the least popular country for UK resident.
- The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people think that genetically modified GM crops are a positive development Others however argue that they are potentially dangerous Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems to what extent do you agree or disagree what others measures do you think effective 61
- The bar chart below shows the hours per week that teenagers spend doing certain activities in Chester from 20002 to 2007 73
- The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...visitors, who visited UK and from UK in million from 1979 to 1999, while the bar chart ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, whereas, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 978.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81773399015 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32801231536 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51724137931 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9821609129 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.25 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.375 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.462177483068 0.215688989381 214% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.229401752039 0.103423049105 222% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.185744912478 0.0843802449381 220% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.336648754419 0.15604864568 216% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.17969751488 0.0819641961636 219% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.