The line graphs below show the number of police officers and criminals in two cities since 2005 and predicted figures up until 2025.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The line graphs illustrate, the comparison of police officials and criminals in two cities (city A and city B) in the year of 2005 and expected ratio on 2025.
Overall, it is clear from the chart that, the highest and increasing number of police officers was in city A. While, in city B, the account of criminals was at the top over the period given.
As is observed in the graph, in 2005, the total number of police officers in city A was about 25,000, which is lower than city B (30,000). While, there was a significant growth in the police officers number in city A, and reached to 35,000 by 2010. Whereas, after five years, the number was gradually decreased to just over 30,000 and the ratio was dramatically increased to 45,000 by 2015. Then there would be a slight decline to 40,000 by 2025. Meanwhile, in city B, there was a moderate reduction in the number of police officers and in 2007 the ratio was lower than city A. Then the account was remained relatively stable up to the end of the period with less than 25,000.
Regarding criminals record, the number of criminals in city B was the highest position compared to city A over the given period. Such as, in 2005, approximately 0.9 million criminals are recorded in city B, whereas, in city A the trend was just below 0.8 million. Both city has some fluctuation in trend, criminal ratio makes up in city A by 2020 with 1.2 million, in turn in city B the ratio was noticeably tumbled to 0.6 million. However, the expected ratio of criminals in 2025 on city A and city B was about 1.1 million and near 0.7 million respectively.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of people living alone in 5 different age groups in the US from 1850 to 2000 77
- Foreign tourists must be charged higher fees than local people to visit cultural places and historical sites Do you agree or disagree with this statement Give your own opinion including relevant examples 87
- The three pie charts below show the changes inannual spending by a pparticular UK school in 1981, 1991, and 2001.summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features , and make comparison where relevent. 56
- The bar chart provides information about how often people in the USA spent ate fast food from 2003 to 2013 55
- Pollution and other environmental problems are resulting from the way that many countries are developing and becoming richer Some think this cannot be avoided To what extent do you agree or disagree 96
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 58, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ear from the chart that, the highest and increasing number of police officers wa...
^^
Line 3, column 70, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... chart that, the highest and increasing number of police officers was in city A....
^^
Line 5, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... number of police officers in city A was about 25,000, which is lower than city B...
^^
Line 7, column 225, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'A' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: A; The
...re recorded in city B, whereas, in city A the trend was just below 0.8 million. Both ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 347, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...riminal ratio makes up in city A by 2020 with 1.2 million, in turn in city B the ...
^^
Line 7, column 485, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e expected ratio of criminals in 2025 on city A and city B was about 1.1 million ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, so, then, whereas, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 7.0 257% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 33.7804878049 172% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1304.0 965.302439024 135% => OK
No of words: 290.0 196.424390244 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.49655172414 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49545603695 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.448275862069 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 389.7 283.868780488 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.397701476 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.307692308 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3076923077 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38461538462 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229658980837 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113299968261 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682450616717 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185245442908 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0661900522627 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.