The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket.

Essay topics:

The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket.

The map shows two potential locations for a new supermarket in the town of Garlsdon.
We can see that the main difference between the proposed sites is that the first site (S1) is in the countryside, while the second site (S2) is in the heart of the town center. Additionally, the crucial transport system for both supermarket locations is a railway.
According to the map, S1 is outside in the town to the northwest of Garlsdon, but this site is within easy reach of the housing zone. Meanwhile, S2 is also surrounded by the residential area and the industrial area.
There are three main roads from Bransdon, Cransdon and Hindon to Garlsdon town center. However, there is a central no traffic zone, this is unable to reach S2 by car. By contrast, the position of S1 can allow accommodating a lot of cars. Both supermarket sites are near the railway which links between Hindon and Cransdon.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-30 morbymuku 67 view
2019-12-06 habeeb omran 84 view
2019-08-18 andrew123 78 view
2019-08-16 mirandajose 78 view
2019-08-13 David Shahi 84 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 737.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72435897436 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.778496784 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564102564103 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 216.9 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.248111054 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.8888888889 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370150887973 0.215688989381 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15082069134 0.103423049105 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.191925804828 0.0843802449381 227% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280111395879 0.15604864568 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.220305107699 0.0819641961636 269% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.8 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.