The two presented maps elucidate the changes of sports courts from a university between 1990 and today.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that there is a massive shift concerning university sports courts from 1990 to now.
In 1990, a park was located in the Northwest of the sports courts, whereas a car park was sited opposite to the park (in the Southwest of the map). By now, both the park and car park had vanished and the location of the park, car park have replaced by the basketball court and the tennis court respectively. In contrast, the tennis court during 1990 was built in the Southwest of the university sports courts. Nevertheless, that location has been changed to the changing room, which was constructed next to the reception in 1991, and a whole new fitness center.
During today, people have been established the east corner of the sports courts into an indoor court. Thus, the outdoor pool in 1990 had been renovated into an indoor pool which the location still remained the same. The reception that was next to the changing room in 1990, and the cafe are still stayed intact over the period.
- Some countries allow old people to work to any age that they want Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The map below shows the town of Lynnfield in 1936 and then later in 2007 64
- Some education systems make students focus on certain subjects at the age of 15 while others require students to study a wide range of subjects until they leave school What are the benefits of each system Which is better 78
- Nowadays children spend more time playing computer games than doing sports Why is it happening Does it have a positive or negative effect on their development 42
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, nevertheless, so, still, thus, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 954.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81818181818 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48057446339 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494949494949 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.4389432202 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.0 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2113276787 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108723248602 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.09712683581 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165564077513 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0743747010006 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.