Map of island before and after
These two maps compare the different features of a certain island before and after building various touristic facilities.
Firstly, it can be clearly seen that the vast majority of the island area was almost unused. Since it has only a small beach on its western part and some trees planted on both sides of the island. However, the central zone of the island was merely free.
On the other hand. Numerous facilities were built later. First of all, a reception was constructed in the heart of the central region. This reception was connected to a restaurant in the northern area and the pier in the Southern part by a car truck. In addition, this pier was used for boat trips. Furthermore, many accommodation units were constructed on both sides of the reception with a footpath connecting the units with each other as well as with the reception. Lastly, it`s interesting to mention that the green areas and the beach were unchanged. Nevertheless, the eastern area of the island was not properly used as before.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-24 | Lill dumpling queen | 78 | view |
- Many people prefer to spend money and not save it. What are the reasons? Is this a positive or negative development? 78
- Map of island before and after 78
- Some people believe that success in life depends on hard work and determination, while others believe that other factors like money and personal appearance are important. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 439, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...th connecting the units with each other as well as with the reception. Lastly, it's i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, lastly, nevertheless, so, well, in addition, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 849.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87931034483 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65460634858 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591954022989 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.626292478 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.75 112.824112599 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5 22.9334400587 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8333333333 5.23603664747 207% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197729480895 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0642655441071 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112548438701 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190336936008 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.162091552599 0.0819641961636 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.43 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.