The provided diagram show the change that occurred in the village park after ten years
An inspection of the data in the first diagram show at 10 years ago, the village was undeveloped with unused spaces and little amenities. At present, futher developments which took place in the village park were the transformation of the spare area to a new picnic area. The pond in the village park doubled in size, which evole into a lake for boating. Where the wooded region 10 years ago was chopped down, there was a construction of new café and public toilets. A new path surrounding the village park has been built for cycling outside
Another notable change was the expansion of children area when it doubled size and it divided into 2 areas: children play area and children soft play area. The government extended the tennis court with the area of it at present was double than 10 years ago. An interesting development had been the introducing of the car park which near the entrance used to accommodate 20 people but now can carry 30 more
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 67
- The line graph shows the percentage of different age groups of cinema visitors in a particular country from 1978 to 2008 67
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the seaside resort of Templeton between 1990 and 2005 78
- The line graph shows the percentage of different age groups of cinema visitors in a particular country from 1978 to 2008 67
- Some people believe that the government should make university education free for all Others disagree and say that students should pay for their own education 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68852459016 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50607074441 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584699453552 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6820121153 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.571428571 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1428571429 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22316147237 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104065235472 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055108653059 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177728920899 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0711344522941 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.