A glance at the provided maps illustrate the comparation of Village Park layout between ten years ago and now. In general, it is clearly apparent that the woods were eliminated and more facilities have been built or enlarged now.
Looking in more detail from the maps, in a decade ago, there were only four facilities including tennis court at the north part, children's play area, car park, and football pitch at the center of the park. The remains area of the park consisted of woods that located at the south east and pond at the south. However, recently, the woods have replaced with toilets and cafe while the old pond is now functioned as boating lake. Additionally, a picnic area has been established at the south west area. Despite new facilities, the old ones now have been enlarged such as tennis court which is now two folds wide, car park that has been increased its capacity by 30 people, children's play area that now has been divided into children's park and softplay area, and football pitch that also now larger than ten years ago. Finally, a cycle path now has been paved around the park.
- Doing volunteer work is a waste of time and shouldn t be encouraged among students Do you agree or disagree with this idea 73
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 78
- The diagram below shows process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry Brick manufacturing 78
- It is not necessary to travel to other places to learn the culture of other people We can learn just as much from books films and the internet Do you agree or disagree 73
- Many people believe that it is a good idea to have a dress code at work place Do you agree or disagree with statement 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'remains'' or ''s'?
Suggestion: remains'; 's
...ll pitch at the center of the park. The remains area of the park consisted of woods tha...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, look, so, while, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 912.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67692307692 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29824848267 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574358974359 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.5213943776 43.030603864 182% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263939568796 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124825816365 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130441784322 0.0843802449381 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256342144025 0.15604864568 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.066409209478 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.