The given map provides information about Architectural changes in Frenton between 1990 and 2012.
Looking from overall perspective, it is readily apparent that There was dramatic changes occurred in 2012 in Frenton when compared to 1990.
Houses were converted into block of flats in the same corner of north-east area. Hotel and gold course was formed in 2012 from Cafe and Park building. However, Entire Trees were cut down in 2012 and made up as Techno Park which was located at south-west corner. In the same way, Restaurant and Super Markets were being formed in the place of Bank and shops respectively.
Playing fields wtth trees which was at centre of north side as well changed to FLATS. Size of Hospital was increased in 2012 in the Frenton centre, In comparison to 1990. Theatre name changed to CINEMA in 2012. Whereas, there were no architectural/position/size changes in Library, high street road and SCHOOL over this 22 years.
- The charts below show the results of a survey about what people of different age groups say makes them most happy Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 10
- The line graph shows the number of bananas imported to 4 countries from 1996 to 2004 30
- The line graph shows the number of bananas imported to 4 countries from 1996 to 2004 72
- The line graph shows the number of bananas imported to 4 countries from 1996 to 2004 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, so, well, whereas, as for, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 795.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06369426752 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98605899786 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649681528662 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 225.0 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.5887194126 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.5 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295444181781 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125324599725 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113651243439 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219618446629 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102749403513 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.