The given pictures detail the changes in a particular beachfront area in Australia between 1950 and the present.
Overall, it is obvious that this old region has significantly been modified with the appearance of more modern facilities to meet visitors' demands.
Firstly, it can be seen that after 7 decades, the road surrounding the beach was expanded and strengthened to the southeast corner of the map. Instead of only one parking area located at the end of the road in 1950, there was an extra one on the left-hand side, which replaced the position of the old playground before. Looking at the central area, both the location and position of the pavilion and nearby dining tables stayed intact during a period of 70 years.
Furthermore, remarkable differences were seen in the coastline area. Despite the existence of 2 pools with 50m and 25m in size lying parallel on the other sides of the beach, more surf clubs were also constructed to make beach activities more diverse and appealing. Moreover, a new restaurant was built next to the surf club to serve healthy and delicious food for travelers.
- In many countries recently young people have been living far from their parents from the time they began studies or work until they married Do you think there are more advantages or disadvantages of this trend 89
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honey bee
- The chart below shows estimated world illiteracy rates by region and by gender for the year 2000 73
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree Provide relevant examples if necessary 89
- Many people believe that university students should pay tuition fees in full themselves because they gain education for their own benefit and not for the society To what extent do you agree or disagree 47
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 376, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...althy and delicious food for travelers.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, moreover, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 920.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91978609626 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70139764898 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.668449197861 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6362109543 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0997893738293 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0438163482972 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502265643553 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0657736541463 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630926952409 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.