The maps below show the changes in an Art Centre from 2010 to today

Essay topics:

The maps below show the changes in an Art Centre from 2010 to today.

Given are the two maps delineating transformations of an Art Center during a course of time of renovation. Perceptibly, the Art Center has experienced drastic modifications with the relocation of the cinema along with the addition of new facilities.
In 2010, In the North of the Art Center there was a road crossing from the west to the east, it connected to the open air carpark. In the interim, intainterment area of the Art located in the center of itself with the cinema in the east and the theater with 200 seats in the west of the Art. Also the cafe shop was located in a corner of the theater in the south-east. In addition, there were Art Galleries in the south of the Cinermer.
Today, there is a new road connected with the original road to the new Art Gallery which is replacing the old Cinema. The theater is expanded to 300 seats but it still keeps the same place. Furthermore, the cafe shop is redesigned and placed at the south of the theater and new Art Gallery. However, the old carpark converts to a multipurpose car park. Meanwhile, the new Cinemas is located south of the Cafe shop.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (8 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-06-02 kevann 89 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 8, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the two maps delineating transformation...
^^^
Line 2, column 292, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... with 200 seats in the west of the Art. Also the cafe shop was located in a corner o...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, still, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 906.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74041967589 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.2068398809 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.3636363636 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1818181818 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149890693249 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571770333203 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550021515639 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104483111725 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324630921578 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.