The maps below show the changes in the city of Nelson in recent times
The diagrams represent how Nilson altered from 2000 to the present
As can be seen from the maps, the city has modified significantly between 2000 and now. Most noticeably, although almost every building has changed, the university of Nilson has remained stable throughout the survey.
In particular, the road is now used only for pedestrians instead of utilizing vehicles as in 2000. The port, which has seen numerous modifications, has been made room for restaurant and bars and clubs nowadays.
Meanwhile, the city center has experienced a change till now, it has established 4 bike rental schemes at all angles. At the present, the new covered market has been built on the right of the city center, whilst, on the left of that, the new shop was constructed in the place of the old market. Moreover, the city witnessed a myriad of modifications, namely hall of residence, new shopping center, new train station which were sprang up around the university, on the west, east, south respectively. Furthermore, the trainline was set up between the university and the new shopping center.
- The diagram illustrates the process of building an igloo 61
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development 73
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today 84
- The picture below shows how a hot balloon works 73
- The diagram below shows the recycling process of aluminum cans
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 429, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'sprung'.
Suggestion: sprung
...ng center, new train station which were sprang up around the university, on the west, ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 920.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11111111111 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87702692907 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633333333333 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4547643832 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0666616035054 0.215688989381 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0274549551567 0.103423049105 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0344823437838 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0273499173843 0.15604864568 18% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297590851514 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 429, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'sprung'.
Suggestion: sprung
...ng center, new train station which were sprang up around the university, on the west, ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 920.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11111111111 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87702692907 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633333333333 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4547643832 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0666616035054 0.215688989381 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0274549551567 0.103423049105 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0344823437838 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0273499173843 0.15604864568 18% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297590851514 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.