The two maps illustrate how the waterfront area of Darwin town changed in the period from 2009 to 2014.
Overall, the waterfront area became greener over this 15-year period with the disappearance of industrial areas and the birth of more trees. Besides, some facilities for education, transportation and accommodation were constructed in 2014.
The most striking change was that all industrialized areas were knocked down. The town spent almost the northern part of the waterfront area on planting more trees and one new footpath was built across the green space. It leads to a brand new harbor which is used to serve maritime operations of the town.
We can also see that the authority expanded the living space for residents by adding three more buildings close to the olds. In addition, they established a new university in the west that formed more amenity for academy. Next to the lake to the west, a small swimming pool was erected right on the site an old industrial area used to be, while two old swimming pools, school, convention center and fishing area stayed unchanged.
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 86
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 67
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 56
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development 78
- The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 912.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01098901099 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70247016758 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648351648352 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6091005535 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.333333333 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203969072748 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886856028905 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111380506987 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162607612862 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134653560885 0.0819641961636 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.