The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam.
The picture illustrates a number of alterations in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam.
Looking at the painting, it is immediately obvious that the things on the west of the river completely disappeared and the most noticeable change that occurred in the town was a huge lake.
In 1990, there was an ancient structure and a forest with rare species to the west of the river, and an irrigated cropland to the east. But with the building of a dam wall, those features no longer existed and were displaced by a large lake which is used for fishing in 2010.
The residential area on the east was moved to the south of the mountains and replaced by a big hotel. Meanwhile, two mountains on the south were used as a base to construct a hydroelectric power dam and as a result a wide range of electricity pylons was also built up nearby
- The graph below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000 84
- Nowadays young people spend too much of their free time in shopping malls Some people fear that this may have negative effects on young people and the society they live in To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The diagram below shows the development of a particular area between 1965 and the present day 78
- The graph below shows UK air pollutants in millions of tonnes from three di erent sources between 1990 and 2005 89
- The graph below shows UK air pollutants in millions of tonnes from three di erent sources between 1990 and 2005 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, look, so, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 703.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50641025641 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81101986401 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589743589744 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.0129901099 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.166666667 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230416060921 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119417987613 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.150449381899 0.0843802449381 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165335126513 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.157290002597 0.0819641961636 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.