The maps below show Colwick Arts Centre in 2005 and today.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The maps below illustrate several renovations to the Colwick Arts Centre in 2005 and present.
Over the 6-year period, the art centre witnessed some spectacular developments. The biggest development is that the wasteland has been replaced by a new stage and an outdoor exhibition and performance area.
In 2005, in the middle of the centre, both the concert hall and cinema were in one room together, but today the cinema and concert hall are expanded into two different rooms in the upper-right hand. Whereas in 2005 there were two galleries, by now there is only one on the left-hand side. Furthermore, a central exhibition area was constructed in the middle of the centre for people to appreciate art. While the information desk remained unchanged, a new drama studio was added nearby the cinema.
Another major change to the building in 2005 was the addition of two new meeting rooms that replaced the snack bar. When in 2005 there was the toilet next to the gallery, today it has been replaced by a coffee shop, and the toilet has moved to the right-hand side. Nevertheless, the wasteland is now used for open-air display and show purpose, with a new stage at the center being surrounded by many trees.
- The maps below show Colwick Arts Centre in 2005 and today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 90
- The graph shows the number of visitors to four international museums between 1980 and 2015 80
- The graph shows the number of visitors to four international museums between 1980 and 2015
- The table illustrates the all time top Olympics medals in several sports and the line graph depicts the number of rewards earned by five different countries in all Olympics 84
- Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants Why do you think people waste food What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1006.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85990338164 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6670167102 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570048309179 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8799350649 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.6 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163077185973 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694328170086 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0787758747472 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125710364956 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0985294796163 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.