The maps below show Colwick Arts Centre in 2005 and today. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The images illustrate the changes that happened in Colwick Arts Centre land between the years 2005_2022.
It is clear that a lot of places were added to the enclosure during the last 17 years. Some erections were divided and some were merged. Also, the wasteland is in excellent use now.
As shown, two gallery rooms used to be on the right side of the land but they were replaced by the concert hall. The two gallery rooms were merged and relocated to the left center of the land. The meeting room was divided and they rebuilt them in the upper left-hand corner of the land, where used to be a snack bar. However, they added a café at the bottom left. The toilet was decreased in size and moved to the right side of the land.
A concert hall was constructed on the top right-hand side of the area; and also a cinema on the left side of that. These two places used to be in a single building in the top center of the land. They also added a drama studio on the right side of the meeting rooms. The information desk is the only place that remained in its previous place. What is more, a central exhibition area was constructed in the very center of the land. Also, the former wasteland of the enclosure is in efficient use today. A lot of trees are planted and a stage was constructed there.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 7.0 271% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1058.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 243.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.35390946502 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25846830773 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481481481481 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.2781247902 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 66.125 112.824112599 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 15.1875 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0469003758507 0.215688989381 22% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0172639269945 0.103423049105 17% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398692246247 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0489185621661 0.15604864568 31% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645495129334 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.7 13.2329268293 51% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.36 11.4140731707 64% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.98 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 7.0 271% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1058.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 243.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.35390946502 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25846830773 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481481481481 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.2781247902 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 66.125 112.824112599 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 15.1875 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0469003758507 0.215688989381 22% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0172639269945 0.103423049105 17% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398692246247 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0489185621661 0.15604864568 31% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645495129334 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.7 13.2329268293 51% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.36 11.4140731707 64% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.98 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.