The maps below show the Happy Valley Shopping Center in 1982 and 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The maps below show the Happy Valley Shopping Center in 1982 and 2012. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given maps illustrate the alteration of the happy valley shopping centre between 1982 and 2012.

Overall. There were noticeable changes after the construction take place and the significant change can be seen in the addition of facilities.

In 1982, the shopping centre was located on the eastern side, which was surrounded by trees, the lake was there towards the northwest, which is beside it there was a pathway leading to the entrance. The lobby area was right after the entrance, the entertainment area was there in the centre of the building, towards the north of which was the food store and on the northwest corner, the coffee shop was there. While towards the south there were four elevators and the toilet to the southwest. Towards to east, the sports store, the electric store and furniture store can be seen.

Enormous changes have been seen after 30 years. The pathway was replaced by a large parking lot, the new furniture retail was constructed in the place of the lake.Whereas the entertainment was certain in its place, the food store and the coffee shop on the north was replaced by the relocated of sports store and electronic store. The area of the shop on the west was divided into four, with situated on the south was food store and themed restaurant was there between two empty rooms. Moreover, the toilets and the elevators had no changes.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-10-26 hien3112 78 view
2024-10-26 Giang Tran 73 view
2024-10-26 Giang Tran 84 view
2024-10-25 hien3112 67 view
2024-10-20 hahoaan 84 view
Essays by user Tường Vân :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he eastern side, which was surrounded by trees, the lake was there towards the no...
^^
Line 7, column 164, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Whereas
...as constructed in the place of the lake.Whereas the entertainment was certain in its pl...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 7.0 300% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1142.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85957446809 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49628061939 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48085106383 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 339.3 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 13.0 4.33902439024 300% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.3492225252 43.030603864 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.2 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0607632378445 0.215688989381 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0367460916863 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780593202445 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0792969519484 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109184607335 0.0819641961636 133% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.