The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton, and planned future development of the site.
This report derives from two pictorial illustrating the current layout of a commercial site on the east of the town Norbiton and the planned renovation blueprint of the sector.
Broadly speaking, the whole manufacturing area is planned to turn into a residential neighborhood with the installment various supporting facilities and residences.
A glance at the graph reveals that, the current roundabout only has two openings and some industries around it. The eastern road from it has a number of factories scattered around it. All these industries will be removed. Shops will set up around the rotary and a hospital will be built at the southeast side of it. The eastern road will have housing on each side and a playground at north. Eventually, it will lead to a school that will be constructed at the far east of the map. As a result, the current country side will be shrinked and shifted at the east side of the map. In the south, at the junction of the two highways a small rotary will be established.
By contrast, two more opening will be added to the traffic circle. One will go towards northwest where homes will be constructed at the end and north side of it. Other will pass through the river as a new bridge is to be established which will connect it with homes and roads at the far northern side. As a result, the current country side will be shrinked and shifted at the east side of the map.
- Nowadays a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 73
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The graph below compares figures for the production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000 It also predicts figures for 2025 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below compares figures for the production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000 It also predicts figures for 2025 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Present a written argument or case to an educated non specialist audience on the following topic Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money This practice can act as an incentive for 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, broadly speaking, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 1.00243902439 1397% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1164.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 251.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6374501992 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67847630746 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486055776892 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 345.6 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.4773482969 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.1428571429 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9285714286 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.64285714286 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.09268292683 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0752119146159 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0332956903336 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438978680344 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0732079778135 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550427540818 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.