The maps below show Pancha Village in 2005 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided maps illustrate the changes in the infrastructure of a village called Pancha between the years 2005 and 2015.
A glance at the maps reveals that the village underwent several significant changes. The most noticeable ones are road development and the demolition of houses.
As presented in the maps, the main road of the village was upgraded in 2015 with lanes and zebra crossing as compared to the dirt road in 2005, moreover, there were more means of transportation travelling on the road in 2015. On the left side, some power poles were constructed, while on the right side, there were small road signs. In the housing area, a number houses were demolished in 2015, moreover, some residents abandoned the antenna and changed to use satellite dishes.
In terms of educational institutions, the primary school in 2005 was extended in 2015 and a secondary school was being constructed in the same area. There was also an expansion of spiritual sites from 2 pagodas in 2005 to 3 in 2015. Finally, there was also an increase in the number of kiosks in the market.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-05 | Neeraja Meduri | 61 | view |
| 2021-08-24 | phg_phg | 78 | view |
- Nowadays more and more people decide to have children later in their life What are the reasons What are the effects on society and family life 73
- Imprisonment Statistics 11
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people think employers should not care about the way their employees dress but the quality at work To what extent you agree or disagree 73
- The diagram details the process of making clothes from plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 44
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, moreover, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89673913043 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75353677877 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559782608696 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.432747065 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.111111111 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160462679057 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665321123862 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672549528265 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108747657834 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617952126966 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.