Presented are the two maps exhibiting the latest transformation in the layout of the town in Kimsville.
As transparent from the maps, this city has become much more modern and dynamic.
One remarkable modification can be seen is that the conversion of the enormous factory which releases a large amount of carbon dioxide, into a software company. This alteration was made due to the fast pace of modern life, the demanding of citizen about software technology is increasing rapidly and people in our contemporary life pay more attention about environment. Another striking change is the demolition of the old cinema and it was altered by a pub to satisfy the hobby of local inhabitants nowadays.
Going further to the northwest of the town, it noticeable that a bunch of trees was cut down to make way for new apartments. This change is easily understandable because the population has been growing ceaselessly day by day and building a new flat like that is a feasible solution to this phenomenon. Moreover, the same alternation with the former also can be witnessed in the southwest of Kimsville town, the authorities decided to replace trees and a football station was their choice instead. About those objects has been remained, the city center still stays at the same place. Additionally, two treeline in the northeast and southeast also unchanged.
- The maps below show recent changes in the town of Kimsville Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The maps below show a science park in 2008 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The maps below show a beachfront area in Australia in 1950 and today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- A serious problem affecting countries right across the globe is the lack of water for drinking washing and other household uses Why do many countries face water shortage and what could be done to alleviate the problem 78
- The table shows the number of mobile phones sold in millions for the period of six years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1134.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0625 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94875449321 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629464285714 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 361.8 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5183834629 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.4 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.073123133918 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0272349235869 0.103423049105 26% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0316666894277 0.0843802449381 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0434189458796 0.15604864568 28% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368951155732 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.