The two maps illustrate the primary changes which have taken place in the town of Kimsville between the year 2002 and today.
In general, it appears that Kimsville has become a much more modern city, with far more infrastructure and less green land.
The left area of the city centre witnessed a noticeable development. In details, trees in this area have been cut down to make way for new apartments in the northwest and a football stadium in the southwest of the city. Moreover, a new train station has also been built in the very west of the town.
If we look at the rest of the city, the green areas and a shopping centre have remained unchanged during this period. However, an old cinema situated in the south of the town has been demolished, and a new pub has been erected. A final change has been the coversion of a factory to a software company these days.
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 73
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 73
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries Cambridge 6 test 1 task 1 81
- The graph compares employment rates in three sectors of the economy in the UK 2000 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, moreover, so, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 716.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.53164556962 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47671417868 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607594936709 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.8154507999 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.5 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0961214731063 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0401320147016 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424631668128 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0636146507405 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046984969543 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.