the maps below show recent changes in the town of Kimsville. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two maps show the main changes which took place in the town of Kimsville between the year 2002 and today. In general, the north and south parts of the city developed with new infrastructure where there were covered by trees in earlier.
First of all, the tree in the north-west of the city has been cut down and replaced by the new building. The city center is located in the center point of the city and on each side of the city center, the new train station and software company where factory demolished has been stood today.
Another striking change is that the old cinema closed down and replaced with pub for the purpose of modern entertainment channel. The shopping center is the only one which remains unchanged. A final interesting development is building the football stadium at the south part of the city where the trees are knocked down.
- These days, people change career several times during their life. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this? 78
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the percentage of greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. 73
- The pictures illustrate the changes in Shipsmouth between 1995 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
- the maps below show recent changes in the town of Kimsville. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- the maps below show recent changes in the town of Kimsville. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 291, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...actory demolished has been stood today. Another striking change is that the old ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... city where the trees are knocked down.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, in general, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 706.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67549668874 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39614326902 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58940397351 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 211.5 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6939975988 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.857142857 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.09202975857 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.045417740067 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062842885629 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0734961804711 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0634043633295 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.