Presented are the two maps exhibiting the changes in the layout of the center in Haiphong city between the year 2010 and today.
As transparent from the maps, this city has become a much more modern and dynamic.
One remarkable modification can be seen is that there are a plenty of bridges has constructed such as Hoang Van Thu bridge, Rao bridge,… Which is easily accessible and matches so many parts of the city for more convenient transference. In 2010, the road quality is significantly faulty and bumpy with a large amount of pot-hole, but the authorities has paid high attention to this issue and has altered it to be more even and flat. Another striking change is that in the south of Lach Tray river, there has been built huge complex, which is full of luxury villas and be protected by a strict security system. Moreover, an enormous commercial center called Aeon located in the north of city, providing a full of shopping & entertainment services for citizens.
If we look at the port, a lot of vacant lot in the past has been converted into new resorts and home stays to boost the attraction tourism of the city. It is also noticeable that a range of entertainment facilities have been erected, such as cinemas, bars and clubs. Going to the north-east of the port area, which is alongside the coast, there is also been pedestrianized for tourists enable to walk around in peace and relax without hearing the sounds of cars all the time. A final interesting development has been the introduction of a bike-rental scheme in this coastal region.
- the picture below show how tomato ketchup is made Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 61
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 85
- The maps below show recent changes in the town of Kimsville Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The maps below show recent changes in the town of Kimsville Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The maps below show a science park in 2008 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 135, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...such as Hoang Van Thu bridge, Rao bridge,… Which is easily accessible and matches ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, moreover, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 7.0 257% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1296.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 271.0 196.424390244 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78228782288 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76109549933 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 106.607317073 158% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619926199262 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 283.868780488 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.8149548756 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.6 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0141728957687 0.215688989381 7% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00653014515451 0.103423049105 6% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0195904354635 0.0843802449381 23% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0163253628863 0.15604864568 10% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028276357971 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 40.7170731707 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 135, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...such as Hoang Van Thu bridge, Rao bridge,… Which is easily accessible and matches ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, moreover, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 7.0 257% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1296.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 271.0 196.424390244 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78228782288 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76109549933 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 106.607317073 158% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619926199262 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 283.868780488 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.8149548756 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.6 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0141728957687 0.215688989381 7% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00653014515451 0.103423049105 6% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0195904354635 0.0843802449381 23% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0163253628863 0.15604864568 10% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028276357971 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 40.7170731707 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.