The maps below show a Science park in 2008 and the same park today.
The maps depict a Science park in 2008 and developments it has undergone till now.
In an overview, park went through significant developments such as addition of new amenities like station, cycle path and University hub. However, some features such as grasslands and reception are missing from the present layout.
To embark on, in 2008, Science park had some notable features such as in North West area was covered by the grassland and close to it were offices and reception. In the West, business units were located which were connected to a car park by a path and another path connected cyber security to the scar park. Cyber security, however was further connected to an IT centre by a path. Lastly, park also had a well established network of roads alongside the railway.
Further, presently park has developed significantly with amenities being added to the park grasslands have been replaced by the research and development centre in north west and and cyber security building in south east. Reception area has also been transformed to the university hub whereas innovation centre is now and IT centre. Interestingly, there are more pathways added to connect different buildings with the each other. While cycle paths are also introduced across the park. Another major construction such as station and bus stop are also observable.
- The pie charts below show the coffee production coffee consumption and the profit distribution around the world 100
- The chart below gives information Information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity for the year 1990 and 2010 56
- Some people say that art is an essential subject and every child should learn it in school Do you agree or disagree 61
- New technology have changed the way children spend their free time Do you think advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages 56
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 358, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'an' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: an; IT
...urity, however was further connected to an IT centre by a path. Lastly, park also had...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 364, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'centres'?
Suggestion: centres
... however was further connected to an IT centre by a path. Lastly, park also had a well...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 175, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...ch and development centre in north west and and cyber security building in south east. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 325, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'centres'?
Suggestion: centres
...whereas innovation centre is now and IT centre. Interestingly, there are more pathways...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 388, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...there are more pathways added to connect different buildings with the each other....
^^
Line 7, column 431, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ifferent buildings with the each other. While cycle paths are also introduced across...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 457, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e each other. While cycle paths are also introduced across the park. Another majo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, lastly, so, well, whereas, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1129.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13181818182 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76642726901 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568181818182 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 349.2 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.1413674533 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0833333333 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233167939537 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0923111243461 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0995208976094 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178804858159 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107893783974 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.