The maps below shows the changes made in an Australian park in 2015 and now.
The given maps compare the transformations that have taken place in an Australian park.
An Australian park has undergone significant changes over the period shown with the introductions of beaches, a cafe, barbie cue and tennis.
Comparing two maps together is followed. Apparently, the ocean, a cycle path and park avenue have been located in the same direction as an Australian park since the period from 2015 to 2020. There were some trees on the west side of the park in the past, but now there have formulated beaches and a barbie cue on the right of the trees.
Although soccer fields remain on the same side of a park, the place of trees and a cafe has superseded in a park. Some trees are planted on the right side of the soccer field. Finally, there was a tree in the south of the soccer field where tennis is now constructed.
- These days more and more people move away from the area where they were born and brought up when they become adults Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages
- The diagrmas below show the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes 100
- The graph below shows the result of a survey of young people in four European countries on thr most effective solutions of global warming 75
- Many people think that some people are naturally good leader others think that people can learn leadership skills Discussing both views and give your opinion 84
- An increasing number of people change their career and place of residence several times during their lifetime Is this a positive or negative development 57
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, finally, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 689.0 965.302439024 71% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56291390728 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55750923192 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549668874172 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 211.5 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8838685987 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.125 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290116020282 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121491636298 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0817284813336 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189237353585 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0711967018744 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.93 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.