The maps show the developments which took place in the coastal town of Youngsville between 1980 and 2005.
In 1980, the town was a much greener residental area with many trees and individual houses, but during the next 25 years the town experinced a number of dramatic changes. The most noticeable is that all the trees south of the River Alanah were cut down, with all the houses along the railway line being knocked down and replaced by skyscrapers. Moreover, a new industrial estate with factories and warehouses sprang up around the airport and school.
Only a few trees north of the river remained. The woodland eas cleared to make way for a park, a golf course and car parking facilities. Further developments were the construction of a stadium near the north-east corner of the lake and a new stretch of railway from the river running directly north. A marina was also built at the mouth of the river.
Overall, a comparison of the two maps reveals a change from a largely rural to a mainly urban landscape.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Technology has made the world a better place to live Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 85
- Changes of the seaside resort of Templeton between 1990 and 2005 78
- Changes of the seaside resort of Templeton between 1990 and 2005 67
- The maps show changes that took place in Youngsville in New Zealand over a 25 year period from 1980 to 2005 What is the most noticeable difference between the two maps 89
- Discuss an accomplishment event or realization that sparked a period of personal growth and a new understanding of yourself or others 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ic changes. The most noticeable is that all of the trees south of the River Alanah were cu...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 46, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...a few trees north of the river remained.The woodland eas cleared to make way for a ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 848.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76404494382 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66649833244 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640449438202 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3074124697 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225967771851 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0925365946398 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117998056903 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164777850274 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131248249054 0.0819641961636 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.