As can be seen from the map, the seaside resort of Templeton experienced significant change from 1990 to 2005.
In 1990, the resort was a quite and undeveloped place with many of trees and individual houses, but during the next 15 years the resort was developed dramatically.
Firstly, the biggest change is that all the invidiual houses in the south-west of the seaside were demolished, with all the trees chopped down and replaced by a supermaket and apartnents. Moreover, a new residental with apartments and the dwellings were built around the lake and supermarket. Only a few trees were remained. Furthermore, all the trees east of the resort was cleared to made way for an airportand some houses, which sprang up around the school and hospital. The woodland and some houses in the south-east of the seaside was replaced by a factory. In addition, a new stretch of the railway along the shore running from east to west. Another, a ferry was also established to transport vehicles.
Overall, there was a complete transformation of this area, the seaside resort of Templeton-from rural village to a mainly urban landscape.
- Changes of the seaside resort of Templeton between 1990 and 2005 67
- Changes of the seaside resort of Templeton between 1990 and 2005 78
- Changes of the seaside resort of Templeton between 1990 and 2005 79
- Apartment vs. Dormitory - University student living 56
- The maps show changes that took place in Youngsville in New Zealand over a 25 year period from 1980 to 2005 What is the most noticeable difference between the two maps 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, in addition, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 947.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03723404255 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92900664055 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56914893617 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.7013128914 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263332783444 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0936471386316 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123429504449 0.0843802449381 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201990632897 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129971953357 0.0819641961636 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.