Given are the two maps delineating the projected transformations of layouts of the existing road system in the future.
It is perceptible that there seem to be drastic rearrangements that are likely to occur red in most areas, especially the proposed change is the construction of a roundabout in the center, and the installation of traffic lights and transform some areas on existing roads.
Starting from the west side of the road system, the school area remains, so there is a plan to install more traffic lights at the intersections where accidents often happen near the school. The next point is the intersections of the forest road and City Road, which is an accident-prone area so is suggested a roundabout to be added.
Another accident anomaly is the intersection of the Lowlands and the Forest Road on the west south side, from which the City road is expected to be straightened to remove the curve. Moreover, in this section of the road in the Northeast, the small road connecting the city road to the supermarket is eliminated, but instead, the supermarket can be accessed from a small road directly from the roundabout intersection.
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports center now and how it will look after redevelopment Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 73
- The chart below shows annual average spending on clothes per person in the US in 1985 1995 and 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 61
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The maps give information about a university sports court 67
- Some people think spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the two maps delineating the projected ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 956.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95336787565 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08080653333 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523316062176 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.7357065607 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.333333333 112.824112599 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.1666666667 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.83333333333 5.23603664747 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141640856788 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775728706572 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0220311095047 0.0843802449381 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0868656899095 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286246882638 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.2329268293 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.