The maps : summarise the changes to Liverpool john moores university from 2010 to 2016.
The maps illustrate the alterations of Liverpool John Moores University between 2010 and 2016. At first glance, it is evident that the most noticeable changes occurred for the replacement of the road which connected the south to the west of the university.
To begin with the north side of the university, the presence of new science building had converted the function of biology, chemistry and physics building in 2010, and this building was located in between new lecture theatre in the south of it and new library and IT suite in the west of it. Moreover, the existence of footpaths, which connected the south part to the west part of the university, in 2016 had changed the position of the road in 2010.
In accordance with the other modifications, 2010 to 2016 witnessed the alterations of the admin building which was moved to beside the new lecture theatre. According to the opposite of the admin building, there were a new bus station and a new café which varied the car park and the road place in previous time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-14 | Milan karki | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-14 | Milan karki | 61 | view |
| 2019-06-20 | jignesh.ghelani | 78 | view |
| 2019-06-20 | jignesh.ghelani | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-11 | alifdores | 73 | view |
- Line graph :number of visitors per month in summer, 2013 (In thousands) 78
- Topic: technology is becoming increasingly prevalent in the world today. In the not too distant future, technology will completely replace the teacher in the classroom. Do you agree with this statement? 67
- Women should give up their jobs and go back to their traditional roles of home maker in order to reduce world’s unemployment. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time. 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of female members of parliament in 5 European countries from 2000 to 2012. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, so, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 851.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7808988764 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67593298614 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.2436119388 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.833333333 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6666666667 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199213305335 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136789340007 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.18568339119 0.0843802449381 220% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16149295251 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134487010931 0.0819641961636 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.04 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.